Neil Bush’s point is relatively rare in mainstream U.S. political discourse .... The chinese system has worked for China

 

Neil Bush’s statement that “the Chinese system has worked for China” reflects a pragmatic acknowledgment of China’s rapid development under its current governance model. It’s a rare sentiment in U.S. political circles, where criticism of China’s system is more common than praise.

Most U.S. politicians and media focus on human rights, freedom of speech, and geopolitical competition, often framing China’s system as authoritarian and problematic. Bush’s stance is more diplomatic and business-oriented, emphasizing mutual respect and cooperation over ideological confrontation

He doesn’t claim China’s system is perfect or universally applicable—just that it has worked for China, given its history, culture, and priorities. This echoes views from some scholars and global leaders who advocate for contextual governance models rather than one-size-fits-all democracy.

Full version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOSp-Lyfob4